|
||||
Starting points: who we are recent updates anonymity news and views home Reviews: Buffy Highlander Oz Star Wars: TPM X-Files RPS those 70's shows Our recs Writing: Fanfic faux pas Interviews Tips, tricks and suggestions Rants: Slash-related editorials Top 10 lists Guest rants Interactive: The beta board Discussion board Contribute Promote the cause Letters to CABS Sign the guestbook View the guestbook Contact Other stuff: Links Reciprocal links CABS corrections, clarifications and general f*ck ups Our birthday Click to subscribe to the updates list |
An overwhelming problem in fan fiction circles is that people don't know the difference between flames and constructive criticism. Most fan fiction lists shy away from real feedback not because they don't know the difference, but because usually the authors don't. If someone makes a suggestion as to how your story can be improved, it is not a flame. Someone saying "I'd like to hear more from that character" does not mean "you suck and should never write again." Artists are not Da Vinci the first time they pick up a paintbrush. Conversely, writers are not born Hemingways. In the real world, it would be nearly inconceivable to send out a short story for publication without getting at least two - ideally three - people to read it and make suggestions for improvement. As much as your story is your baby, it ain't perfect, kid. Just because you are not writing for publication, but instead writing for a mailing list or web site, does not mean you are exempt from improving. Writing, whether it be professionally or as a hobby, is something that can always be done better. If you are writing, you should want to make it better.
The following are standard things that are addressed when someone gives
constructive feedback on your story: 1. Spelling and grammar.It doesn't matter if you used your spell checker, or if you went through the story with a fine tooth comb. Someone is bound to find something you've overlooked. Do you want it corrected, or do you want it sitting there, sticking out like a sore thumb? I thought so. I make mistakes. You make mistakes. We all make mistakes. It is the people who are open to someone telling them, gently, when they've made mistakes that separates the men from the boys. Any outright attack on your personally, or your writing as a whole, can be considered a flame. Examples: "You really suck at this," or "You're a jerk who can't write" or "Why don't you give up and go home?" These are never acceptable. Know the difference when someone is giving you honest suggestions for improvement and when someone is attacking you. Then respond accordingly. A good way to criticize constructively is to give two things you liked for every one thing you didn't. Example: "I really liked your insight into Mulder, and I thought your dialogue was beautiful. However, I would have liked to see a bit more of this." Here is a standard response to constructive criticism. Feel free to copy and paste it: "Hi, _____. I'm thrilled that you read my story so closely. Thanks for the feedback. I'll take your suggestions into consideration."Standard response to a flame: "Fuck off." Now that we've established that constructive criticism is a good thing, if you still don't want it, then what are you afraid of? Writers generally live in a world of constructive, and not so constructive, criticism. Maybe you're not vying for a spot in a top-notch anthology, but the Internet is full of writers who either do it for a living or want to. If they suspect that you want to be exempt from the standard protocol they face every day and still call yourself a writer, they will eat you alive. Happy writing. - Jane |